Throughout the initial half of 2025, there have been widespread reductions of middle management roles, drastically shifting the structures of corporations. Various sectors are implementing flatter organizational structures to promote efficiency and cost reductions. This shift, sometimes referred to as the “Great Flattening”, leaves middle managers in a challenging position, whether to remain with their current employer and adapt to the structural changes or seek new opportunities. 

When a company initiates large-scale structural changes to reduce management positions, it can be difficult to understand what the implications are for current roles. With this increased uncertainty and changes in workloads, managers must reflect on whether it’s strategic for their career progression to remain with their current organization and work to adjust to the role they end up in after the structural shift, or if they should explore other opportunities. 

When undergoing structural changes, the responsibilities of management roles may be condensed into one position. While this allows a more straightforward chain of management, it simultaneously increases the workload of the manager who remains. This manager is now tasked with a heavier workload than they originally signed up for, and often does not receive additional wages to compensate for it. Stuck in a situation such as this one, staying with one's current employer presents many positives and drawbacks. 

A benefit of sticking out the position during these organizational changes is familiarity with the company culture. While the company is making changes, having an understanding of the workplace environment is a unique benefit of staying. It can take a while to adapt to a new environment and immerse oneself in the culture of a new organization. 

Additionally, taking on increased responsibility from other roles demonstrates adaptability and strong leadership. Displaying such skills can highlight capabilities, potentially leading to promotions later on. If upper management recognizes these leadership skills, staying and adapting to the new corporate structure can lead to impactful career growth. 

While the benefits associated with remaining in the organization are certainly appealing, the reduction in other middle management positions will leave gaps within the organization. These gaps will result in the remaining managers being left to fill the gaps. Managers might be expected to learn new skills, assume more direct reports, and lead unfamiliar initiatives. Furthermore, these shifts in roles can lead to unclear expectations, making daily workloads to become more challenging. Ultimately, this uncertainty may cause burnout and increased stress. 

Given that the organization has already undergone structural changes, it’s possible that changes may persist in the near future. The organization is still adapting, which may lead to more roles being removed or replaced. It’s important to consider role security as well as career progression. With fewer management roles available within the organization, be realistic when considering the future pay for promotion. 

Given the organizational changes, prioritize becoming indispensable to the organization. While the changes may already be in effect, that doesn’t necessarily mean more changes won’t occur in the future. Using this time as an opportunity to demonstrate strengths to upper management can build a strong foundation for career advancement later on. 

A strong capability of a good leader is embracing cross-functional teams. With fewer managers in the organization, it is critical to leverage cross-functional teams to fulfill objectives. Cross-functional teams encourage collaboration throughout the organization, which can increase morale as well as create more efficient operations. Drawing on the departmental expertise can promote better solutions since certain areas are now lacking expertise from managers.

Another strategy to demonstrate value to upper management is through developing specialized expertise. Leaning into new responsibilities and gaining important insights about specific organizational practices or initiatives can truly set someone apart. Being able to not only take on new roles but thrive in doing so demonstrates strong adaptability and willingness to learn. 

To gain insights on direct reports and continue to develop leadership skills, utilize performance management tools. Not only will such tools support management duties, but they will also help create solutions to better manage teams and improve leaders’ performance. Performance management tools are a strong asset for managers looking to set themselves apart following large structural changes. 

While staying and adapting to the organizational changes presents opportunities to grow in responsibility, seeking a new opportunity may be the more advantageous solution. With the removal of other middle managers, roles will shift drastically, resulting in considerably more work and new workplace challenges to navigate. Electing to seek a new position can allow for a career that has more defined responsibilities and expectations. 

Additionally, seeking a new opportunity allows for the ability to find a role with a more adequate workload.

Seeking a position elsewhere is not without challenges. Entering a new organization will entail transitional challenges as well as potential for underemployment. Consider what to prioritize when navigating whether to stay or go. 

When determining whether to stay amidst a reduction in middle management, utilize resources to weigh the options. Reach out to horizontal mentors and executive mastermind groups to gain their insights on the situation and learn from their shared experiences. Mentors may have a meaningful perspective or key considerations to help guide the decision-making process. 

During this time, it’s critical to identify career aspirations to consider how the next step could help or hinder these goals. Be introspective and identify what aspects of an organization are most important for the next phase of your career. 

The rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has led many organizations and managers to begin incorporating AI systems into their daily operations. Given the speed of providing information and the dynamic nature of AI, it is a powerful tool businesses can leverage to make transformative changes. Despite these appealing benefits, AI also presents considerable challenges that must be navigated appropriately by managers and employees when implementing such software. 

When creating algorithms for AI applications, specific data is chosen for the training of the system. Oftentimes, this data can be biased and discriminatory against different groups of people or specific facts. These biases can lead to unfair outcomes when utilizing AI for hiring practices, promotions, and access to resources.  

Not only can this bias impact hiring practices, but the historical information AI is based upon can lead to inaccuracies and biased information when conducting research. When using AI as a search engine or source of inspiration, outdated information can cause employees to draw outdated conclusions, thus impacting the accuracy of their work. 

2. Privacy Concern

As a manager, there are dual responsibilities to support team needs as well company company-wide goals. While employees may feel compelled to utilize AI to complete minuscule daily tasks and expedite their processes, it’s important to ensure privacy measures are considered to protect important company information. AI collects and stores various personal data when interacting with it, which poses a threat when employees use the software for sensitive data. 

These dynamic AI systems can gather personal and sensitive company information. Without proper safeguards in place, these can lead to a myriad of privacy violations. It’s crucial to ensure that employees comply with data protection regulations, ensuring the safety of personal and company information. 

3. Ethical Usage 

Another important consideration is the ethical usage of AI and the potential to generate misleading information. The inability of AI to properly aggregate information or summarize important facts can lead employees to make inaccurate decisions. These slight errors can undermine the communication of information and the functionality of teams. 

Another concern regarding ethical usage is employees failing to disclose their AI usage. Employees may utilize AI to complete some or the entirety of a task, but fail to communicate the AI usage to their manager. This lack of disclosure can lead to inconsistencies in the quality of work produced as well as additional security vulnerabilities. 

While AI does present challenges with biased and outdated information, potential privacy concerns, and complex ethical usage concerns, the increased efficiency and productivity from the incorporation of AI can provide immense benefits for a team. It’s important for managers to develop effective strategies for how their team should utilize AI in order to ensure safe and productive use. 

If not already predetermined by the organization, develop and communicate clear AI usage policies to each member of the team. Ensure that the policy includes specific AI software that can be used and guidelines for what information can be handled with AI. Furthermore, address the ethical and legal concerns surrounding AI usage. 

2. Practice Regular Monitoring 

Implement regular check-ins to evaluate how team members are using AI. Evaluating how team members assess the quality of information provided by AI, what tasks AI is being used for, and looking for any discriminatory patterns manifesting from the usage of AI can help prevent problems from persisting. 

3. Incorporate Training Sessions 

Help equip the team with proper knowledge and skillsets for using AI through regular training sessions. Some team members may be incredibly familiar with AI, while others may have no background in it. Providing comprehensive training that discusses the basics of AI and best practices can help all team members feel comfortable with the software. Consider implementing additional periodic training sessions to expand on the team's AI capabilities and reinforce the ethical considerations associated with AI. 

4. Develop Response Plans 

An important tool when navigating AI in the workplace is the development of a response plan. Preparing for how to handle a potential data breach or other privacy concerns can help minimize the harm and prevent the escalation of the issue. Establish a clear protocol within the team for handling potential privacy concerns so all team members are prepared for issues they may encounter.

5. Encourage Cross-Functional Interactions 

Encourage the collaboration of cross-functional interactions when incorporating AI within the team. Collaborate with departments such as IT and legal to ensure cohesive and effective AI risk management strategies. Utilizing an approach that leverages the competencies of other departments can ensure optimal AI practices are utilized.

To mitigate potential concerns with leaking important customer or company information through AI, hold meetings or provide training sessions for employees on how to properly use AI within their role. 

Navigating unprecedented circumstances can be challenging as a manager who has various responsibilities to their team and the organization as a whole. For support in navigating such circumstances, it’s helpful to leverage horizontal mentorship to gain insights from peers in the same position. Sharing experiences and learning other strategies for best incorporating AI within the workplace can ensure a smoother transition. 

Another powerful way managers can utilize AI is by leveraging these tools to gather problem-solving insights. When managers use AI, it’s important to utilize industrial-organizational psychologist-reviewed prompts in order to ensure the accuracy of the solutions the AI provides. Management software such as AIM Insights utilizes industrial-organizational psychologist-reviewed prompts in order to provide tailored feedback, ensuring the implementation of effective management styles. AI management software can transform how managers manage. 

Artificial intelligence is a powerful tool that can positively impact team functions. Although AI does present new challenges to the workplace, they can be tackled with the implementation of clearly communicated strategies. AI is constantly adapting, and strong leaders can adapt with it. 

Managers are often encouraged to listen and collaborate during decision-making, but sometimes, this democratic leadership style isn’t the most effective approach. While inclusivity and participation can empower employees, certain decisions require managers to be more direct. Understanding the balance between executive authority and team involvement can transform a slow, confused organization into an efficient and motivated one. 

A company’s vision is the purpose and direction of a company, which should largely be shaped by executive leadership. Long-term goals set the path for the organization and require a high-level understanding of the environment in which the organization operates, including markets, competitors, and brand identity. While gathering input from various department heads may provide valuable insights, the ultimate decision should fall within the scope of executives. 

Vision setting and other large-scale corporate decisions are not situations well suited for a democratic process. Working to incorporate too many opinions can dilute focus and prevent decisive action. It is the responsibility of leadership to guide the organization toward a strong, cohesive future, even if decisions aren’t popular in the short term. 

With all this being said, managers should still gather feedback. Successful leaders consistently gather data from employees, not to vote on strategies, but to inform them. Surveys, one-on-one conversations, and management insight tools can support leaders in gathering information from their workforce. 

While strategic decisions may require top-down leadership, day-to-day decisions often benefit from a democratic approach. Processes that affect how employees do their work, such as communication channels or workflow tools, are great opportunities for collaborative decision-making. 

When employees are involved in decisions that directly impact them, they are more likely to feel empowered and valued within the organization. Consequently, this can improve retention, morale, and overall productivity. Conversely, top-down decisions about operations can lead to frustration and inefficiency if they don’t reflect the needs of the workers these decisions are impacting. 

Consider a team that is told to adopt a new communication software. An executive decision might prioritize cost without considering the ways in which workers actually utilize their communication channels. However, if the team is involved in a trial period or able to provide their input to select a communication software, there will be better adoption and reinforcement of a culture of trust. 

To decide if a decision should involve democratic input, weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks of involving employees in each scenario. Here are some things for managers to consider when weighing the pros and cons: 

Using some of these points of consideration, managers can weigh the stakes and evaluate the context to better inform their decision-making approach. When making decisions, managers may struggle to communicate with their employees about how and why a decision was made. These are some tips that managers can use when implementing a decision-making process. 

Utilizing democratic decision-making styles is not suitable for every situation. Managers should consider the context of a decision and weigh the benefits and drawbacks of leveraging a more collaborative approach. The key for managers is to find a balance that allows for efficient and aligned with the company’s larger mission. 

A well-functioning organization uses more directive leadership when supporting the company’s vision, but gives a voice to employees when decisions relate to day-to-day operations. Managers who understand the difference between leadership and collaboration create more effective organizations. 

The most successful leaders aren’t the ones who stay within their comfort zone but are those who embrace calculated career risks. One of the most impactful career decisions a leader can make is transitioning from one leadership position to another, even though this can be intimidating. Whether it's changing from Vice President of Marketing to Vice President of Sales or shifting to a completely different role, taking these calculated risks can allow for immense personal and professional growth, supporting career development. 

Taking a career risk shouldn’t feel like rolling the dice and hoping for the best. Embracing career risks should involve logical decision-making and strategic planning to evaluate the opportunities and setbacks of the decision. Here are some things to consider when calculating the risk of making a large-scale career decision: 

First and foremost, reflect on whether the potential career change aligns with overall career goals. Even if a great and exciting opportunity presents itself for a role change, it may not be the right fit if this shift doesn’t align with personal career aspirations. Simply seeking a new role to experience change without considering the broader implications for career trajectory can lead to setbacks rather than progress. Calculated risks are those driven by purpose rather than just curiosity. 

2. How transferable are your current skills to the new role? 

Another important consideration is the ability to transfer current knowledge and skills to the new role. While leadership experience and strong problem-solving skills apply to various management roles, a lack of foundational technical skills may be a challenge for certain positions. Reflect on what skills may need to be acquired and the time required to develop such skills for the new role. 

3. Identify potential consequences

If a new career opportunity aligns with career goals and has a feasible required skillset, the next criterion to consider is the consequences of the career shift. Some consequences may be a steep learning curve, decreased confidence, or even needing to dedicate time to acquire new skills. Considering all the potential consequences will allow for a more informed decision and prevent being blindsided in the future by issues that arise. 

4. Develop strategies to overcome these consequences 

Once potential risks have been identified, plan strategies to proactively manage them. Taking a proactive rather than a reactive approach to addressing potential consequences is crucial in creating a smooth transition from one role to the next. Some potential strategies could include joining an executive mastermind group for a stronger support system or self-studying to improve upon necessary skills. Preparing for challenges not only makes the transition to a new role smoother but also demonstrates strong leadership qualities that will be recognized by others in the organization. 

One of the greatest obstacles leaders face when considering a career risk is the fear of failure. It’s entirely natural to prefer to exist within the comfort zone and avoid change. Many people tend to experience loss aversion, which is the tendency to avoid the potential feeling of failure despite the ability to experience great successes. Even though leaders may experience a sense of loss aversion, the ability to break down the risk and consider all possible outcomes can work to overcome this cognitive bias. Fear of failure and loss aversion are often rooted in uncertainty. By utilizing the previously mentioned strategies to create a well-thought-out plan, leaders can regain a sense of control. 

A powerful tool that can be leveraged to overcome a fear of failure is developing a growth mindset. Transitioning to a growth mindset means embracing each new challenge as an opportunity for improvement rather than an obstacle. Strategies to develop a growth mindset over time can be to start with reframing views on small obstacles and progressing to larger-scale obstacles. 

Being stagnant in a role and not pursuing calculated career risks may seem safer, but this can backfire. Hesitating to embrace calculated career risks can cause leaders to miss out of faster career growth opportunities, restrict them to narrowly defined roles, and even create the perception that they lack ambition. Strong risk aversion can also limit the perspective that leaders have within the organization. Leaders who have experience across departments and within different roles can contribute more to strategic conversations that span multiple departments. While avoiding risk can seem inconsequential, this may cause more harm than good. 

In the long term, remaining comfortable in one position can decrease momentum and reduce a leader’s competitive edge. Organizations are constantly evolving, so leaders who don’t seek opportunities to grow may find themselves falling behind peers who take advantage of calculated opportunities. Recognizing when opportunities can support leadership evolution can be transformative for one's career.

Strong leaders are created by the ability to seek change and embrace challenges. Embracing calculated career risks can be a pivotal moment within a leader's career to elevate their leadership skills. Beyond personal growth, taking calculated risks can position leaders to become more adaptable and prepared for larger organizational responsibilities. Demonstrating the ability to accept risks signals that a leader is not only capable of navigating uncertainty but also able to lead strongly through it. 

Louis is a French manager working at an international clothing company. While working in the French branch of the firm, Louis has been recognized numerous times for his strong leadership and effective communication. Due to his successes, Louis got relocated to the American branch of the firm to assist with the implementation of a new clothing line. After 2 months of managing in the United States, Louis is astounded to hear from a colleague that Louis’s team members have complaints about his leadership style. While Louis was an effective leader for his French team members, his incredibly direct leadership style comes across as cold and abrasive to his American team members. To effectively manage his new team, Louis must adjust his leadership style to accommodate the new cultures represented in his team. 

Louis, like many managers of multicultural teams, relied on his home country’s culture and management styles when working with individuals from different cultures. While this management style may be effective in one's home country, it's crucial that managers adapt to the cultures within their teams. Whether relocating to another country or managing a cross-cultural team in one's home country, these are some strategies to leverage to effectively lead a multi-cultural team. 

When leading a cross-cultural team or managing in a foreign country, it’s important to conduct research about the other culture(s) to develop a deeper understanding. Cultures may vary drastically in their communication styles, views on hierarchy, methods of handling conflict, and other critical interpersonal aspects. Learning about these variances will allow managers to better understand how their team members think about and perceive the world. 

There are various cultural frameworks that provide detailed breakdowns of differences between cultures that can enhance management effectiveness. Trumpenaars, Hofstede, and GlobeSmart are a few of the many existing frameworks that outline key cultural differences. Each framework has different dimensions that are used to evaluate cultures. Breaking down the different dimensions to understand them and thinking holistically about the differences in cultures will build a strong foundation for managing a cross-cultural team. 

2. Acknowledge Cultural Differences 

After researching different cultures to learn more about them, collaborate with the team to further understand critical cultural differences. While it may seem uncomfortable, encouraging open communication about cultural differences will take away some of the guesswork of trying to navigate a multicultural setting. Asking questions and learning about other cultures outside of the work environment will create an open space that embraces the variety of cultures. 

While conducting research on other cultures creates a solid background of different cultures, recognize that learning from the team members is the best way to truly understand a culture. Furthermore, each person is different and may not entirely fit into the norms of their culture. Being curious and creating time to discuss these differences will demonstrate a desire to learn and grow together. 

 
3. Establish Team Norms 

Once cultural differences have been identified and discussed, establishing team norms will allow for improved workplace performance. Collaborate with the entire team when building these norms. Forming these norms as a group increases group buy-in and ensures all team members feel committed to the team norms. 

Consider the variances in cultures and how they may shape the team norms. Some cultures tend to be extremely rigid with deadlines, while others have more flexible timing. Cultural differences in hierarchy may mean that some team members will seek more frequent approval from management while others may operate more autonomously. Make sure to establish clear norm expectations that take into consideration these different ways of working. 

4. Overcommunicate 

Within a cross-cultural team, overcommunicating can be a key to success. While it may seem redundant to constantly check in with team members, ensuring frequent communication will make sure everyone is on the same page. Especially at the beginning of team formation, prioritizing communication will prevent team members from making their own assumptions. 

Cross-cultural teams may be comprised of individuals who have different first languages. It can be difficult to communicate when there is a language barrier within a team, so simplifying communication can prevent interpretation issues. While using less complex words and slowing down communication can make sure everyone understands what is being said, actively make sure to avoid foreigner talk. Foreigner talk is characterized by using slower and louder speech, which can be offensive to non-native speakers. 

5. Avoid Assumptions

While it’s natural to have a perception of different cultures, actively make sure it avoid assumptions about individuals based on their cultural identity. Furthermore, avoid assuming that everyone on the team is in agreement or has a shared understanding. Cultures vary on how people indicate they agree with something, so assuming that everyone is on the same page simply because there is no vocal disagreement is not a reliable strategy. Leveraging strong communication and feedback mechanisms will help to avoid making incorrect assumptions. 

Another assumption that is often made in cross-cultural settings is based on language ability. When someone is more fluent in a language, they are often perceived as more capable than individuals who are less fluent. Make sure to avoid making assumptions of cognitive ability solely based on language skill as the team may over or underestimate team member abilities. 

Incorporating these strategies can be challenging, as there are many dynamics involved in culture. Recognize that it takes time to adjust management styles and its a constantly evolving process. To gain insights on effective strategies for managing a cross-cultural team, leverage performance management software. Managers may also find it helpful to discuss challenges with peer mentors to learn about the strategies they found most effective when dealing with similar challenges. 

Through the use of these 5 strategies, Louis was able to adjust his management style to fit the needs of his new team. Recognizing that Americans have a strong preference for less direct criticism and a stronger sense of team camaraderie, Louis implemented more team bonding activities and conversational feedback mechanisms. After shifting his management style, Louis saw a positive change in his team's productivity and was able to better support his team.